OUTDOOR PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES IN THE EDUCATIONAL CONTENT OF LATVIAN AND FOREIGN SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Roberts Radičuks
  • Inta Bula-Biteniece
  • Renārs Līcis
  • Inese Ļubinska
  • Ainars Tomašs
  • Andris Pīlups
  • Irēna Dravniece
  • Antra Gulbe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61800/lase_joss.v14i1.5

Keywords:

outdoor classes, government, education system, PE curriculum

Abstract

In Latvia, the conduct of outdoor physical education classes is influenced by both the climate and the challenges of the learning process, therefore, conducting the physical education classes outside the school premises (outdoors) is a topical and challenging subject. The purpose of this literature review is to: 1) find out the benefits of organizing physical education classes outside the school premises (outdoors), 2) find out what is the regulatory framework of the outdoor physical education classes would be in general education schools in Latvia and abroad, 3) compare the status of Latvian and foreign outdoor physical education classes in the educational content of schools. Results: conducting physical education classes outside the school premises (outdoors) provides benefits in the following groups of benefits – learning benefits, health, environment. Compared to other countries, outdoor physical education classes in Latvia are possible, but not mandatory. There are countries where the status of outdoor physical education classes is lower, but in the Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden, Estonia, Norway) the status of outdoor physical education classes is the highest, and conducting such physical education classes is especially encouraged.

References

Andrieieva, O., Blystiv, T., Byshevets, N., Moseychuk, Y., Balatska, L., Liasota, T., ... & Bohdanyuk, A. (2022). Assessment of the impact of outdoor activities at leisure facilities on the physical activity of 15-year-old schoolchildren during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Allison, P. (2016). Six waves of outdoor education and still in a state of confusion: Dominant thinking and category mistakes. Pedagogical Quarterly , 240 (2), 176-184.

Ardahan, F. (2012). Life satisfaction and emotional intelligence of participants/nonparticipants in outdoor sports: Turkey case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 4-11.

Bowker, R., & Tearle, P. (2007). Gardening as a learning environment: A study of children’s perceptions and understanding of school gardens as part of an international project. Learning Environments Research, 10, 83-100.

Cabinet Regulation No.66. Republic of Latvia. Available online (29/12/2022), https://likumi.lv/ta/id/71039-darba-aizsardzibas-prasibas-nodarbinato-aizsardzibai-pret-darba-vides-troksna-radito-risku

Cabinet Regulation No. 662. Republic of Latvia. Available online (29/12/2022) https://likumi.lv/ta/id/326513-epidemiologiskas-drosibas-pasakumi-covid-19-infekcijas-izplatibas-ierobezosanai

Cabinet Regulation No. 747. Republic of Latvia. Available online (29/12/2022) https://likumi.lv/ta/id/303768-noteikumi-par-valsts-pamatizglitibas-standartu-un-pamatizglitibas-programmu-paraugiem

Colella, D., & D'Arando, C. (2021). Teaching styles and outdoor education to promote non-linear learning. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 507-513.

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Factsheet 56, LV56. Available online (29/12/2022) https://osha.europa.eu/lv/publications/factsheet-56-introduction-noise-work

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, (2013). Sporta izglītība un fiziskās aktivitātes Eiropas skolās. Eurydice ziņojums. Luksemburga: Eiropas

Savienības Publikāciju birojs. Available online (29/12/2022) http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice

Eurydice: National Education Systems. 2022. Available online (29/12/2022) https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-education-systems

Hatori, M., & Panda, S. (2010). The emerging roles of melanopsin in behavioral adaptation to light. Trends in molecular medicine, 16(10), 435-446.

Humberstone, B., & Pedersen, K. (2001). Gender, class and outdoor traditions in the UK and Norway. Sport, education and society, 6(1), 23-33.

Hurych, E. (2012). Three approaches to outdoor activities and synergy of their interconnections. Journal of Outdoor Activities, 6(2), 15-23.

Jansone, R., Fernāte, A., & Bula-Biteniece, I. (2016). Pupils' opinion on the implementation of sports education in sports lessons. Sports pedagogy yesterday, today, tomorrow (original (Latvian) – Skolēnu viedoklis par sporta izglītības īstenošanu sporta stundās. Sporta pedagoģija vakar, šodien, rīt.) RaKa, 105

Konefał, M., Chmura, P., Zacharko, M., Baranowski, J., Andrzejewski, M., Błażejczyk, K., & Chmura, J. (2021). The influence of thermal stress on the physical and technical activities of soccer players: lessons from the 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia. International Journal of Biometeorology, 65, 1291-1298.

Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(5), 485.

Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(5), 485.

Norway National Curriculum (2022). Available online (29/12/2022) https://www.udir.no/in-english/curricula-in-english/

Volodko, I., & Cernajeva, S. (2019). SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ACTIVITIES OF PUPILS IN LATVIA-FUTURE VISION FOR SUCCESSFUL STUDIES IN A UNIVERSITY. In ICERI2019 Proceedings (pp. 830-836). IATED.

Geske, A., Grīnfelds, A., Kangro, A., Kiseļova, R., & Mihno, L. (2015). Quality of Education: International Comparison: Latvia in OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. Riga: University of Latvia.

Pollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., Becker, L. A., Pieper, D., & Hartling, L. (2020). Chapter V: overviews of reviews. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version, 6.

Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., & Teamey, K. (2016). The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. In Towards a convergence between science and environmental education (pp. 193-200). Routledge.

Russia, description of school education content, (2021). Available online (29/12/2022) https://www.arhcity.ru/data/263/FGOSOO.pdf

Russia, sanitary norms in schools (2010). Available Online (29/12/2022) https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293811/4293811314.htm

Tortella, P., Ceciliani, A., Fumagalli, G., Jidovtseff, B., Wainwright, N., Fjortoft, I., ... & Sääkslahti, A. (2021). Children’s outdoor movement education: position statement. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(Supplement 1).

Tsai, T. H., Liu, Y. L., Ma, I. H., Su, C. C., Lin, C. W., Lin, L. L. K., ... & Wang, I. J. (2021). Evolution of the prevalence of myopia among Taiwanese schoolchildren: a review of survey data from 1983 through 2017. Ophthalmology, 128(2), 290-301.

Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears?: a conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English Forest Schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental education research, 22(6), 868-892.

Published

07.01.2024